data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac63/0ac63a98861c1b0eab81674d57151af9e46592b5" alt=""
It is all but inconceivable that Afghanistan could oppose a cluster bomb treaty. The Russians made extensive use of them in their failed conquest of the territory of the Afghan state, circa 1978-1989. They wounded and maimed thousands of Afghans, many of whom were civilians and children. Last week, hours before the treaty signing ceremony, the Afghan government of Hamad Karzai reversed course. The New York Times speculated that the shift in position reflected the waning influence of the Bush II administration in Afghanistan, in the failed president's final weeks as a lame duck. The Times said the announcement was unexpected in Oslo and, "A group of Afghan survivors of cluster bombs, most of them in wheelchairs or on crutches, burst into tears when they heard [it.]"
Hopefully, President-elect Obama will recognize that cluster bombs, like land mines are nefarious weapons designed to punish an enemy's non-combatant civilians. They are not a weapon America needs in its arsenal.
2 comments:
wow. i hardly thought i'd ever have occasion to use these words, but "go afghanistan!"
Indeed, Song, "Go Afghanistan!"
Odds are residents of Afghanistan are hearty folk, they and their forebears having successfully resisted invasion by the British, Soviet and United States empires. Too bad that they don't fit well into the modern conception of the nation-state. They are likely to continue to receive a very tiny, short, little end of the stick.
Post a Comment